<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Discussing a Technology Lifecycle Taxonomy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leodesousa.ca/2008/04/discussing-a-technology-lifecycle-taxonomy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leodesousa.ca/2008/04/discussing-a-technology-lifecycle-taxonomy/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=discussing-a-technology-lifecycle-taxonomy</link>
	<description>a practical approach by Leo de Sousa</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:38:39 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Phelps</title>
		<link>http://leodesousa.ca/2008/04/discussing-a-technology-lifecycle-taxonomy/comment-page-1/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Phelps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leodesousa.ca/?p=46#comment-121</guid>
		<description>We use the word &quot;Leverage&quot; rather than Sustain.   We like the implication that this is technology that we want to take advantage of and use to its fullest value.  It is a semantic subtlety that seems to work with our leadership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We use the word &#8220;Leverage&#8221; rather than Sustain.   We like the implication that this is technology that we want to take advantage of and use to its fullest value.  It is a semantic subtlety that seems to work with our leadership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
